The Name’s Marlowe, Christopher Marlowe: Why I’m not an English Professor
The Way I Was
It seems
natural, as someone who loves books and is currently studying to become a high
school English teacher. Why not take the next step and, after getting my
masters, go for a doctorate in English? Teachers with masters often get paid
more, and it opens up more career opportunities within the education system as
well as associate professorships at colleges (1). When I was in my second year
at college, I was thinking about eventually becoming an English professor. It seemed like it was the same as teaching
high school, except your students are generally more dedicated and you have
more freedom with what you teach. Sure there were these papers you had to
write, but that sounded cool. I like books why not write papers about them.
Isn’t that what I was doing already just on a lower level?
Yes and No
The answer is both Yes and No, definitely not. That
spring I took an English class called Shakespeare’s contemporaries. We read
plays by John Webster, Ben Johnson, Thomas Middleton, Thomas Kyd, and spent a
great deal of time listening to my professor fan over Christopher Marlowe. For
those who don’t know, Christopher Marlowe, most likely a real-life James Bond,
is one of the most interesting figures in the English Renaissance. He wrote
wildly popular plays, such as Tamburlaine
the Great, a story of a conqueror, Doctor
Faustus, which is my professor’s favorite and is about a professor’s trade
with the devil his soul for great knowledge, and many others. While he was
studying at Cambridge, Marlowe didn’t attend classes for an extended period of
time and spent a lot of money, that it didn’t make sense that he had, as even
then college students were broke (2). However, when the University of Cambridge
attempted to not give Marlowe his degree, as he had been off partying, they
received a letter that ordered them to give Marlowe his degree anyways as, he
had been engaged in “affaires” in “matters touching the benefit of his country”
(3).
Christopher Marlowe = James Bond?
Many scholars,
therefore, theorize that Marlowe was a spy, which would explain his extended
absences and lavish spending habits. Finally, there’s also the strange
circumstances of his death. Marlowe was stabbed to death, while hanging out
with 3 guys: a known swindler , a conman informer, and an English doubleagent (2). The official report says that Marlowe was killed in self-defence
by the swindler after Marlowe tried to stab him over who was going to pay the
bill, but there are other theories. The one my professor told us about is that
Marlowe might have been a double agent and was therefore killed on orders of
the queen, or one of her employees’ orders, because he was such a dangerous man
with all his thoughts and playwriting ideas. Psh free thought. Who needs it
right? /s* Whatever the theory you chose
to adhere to, Christopher Marlowe was mysteriously dead at the age of 29.
The Point is…
But what does this have to do with me being an English
Professor? Well, while my professor’s obsession with Christopher Marlowe was
endearing as well as entertaining, the assignments were not. The other
obsession of my professor was literary criticism, otherwise known as those
papers that English professors write in addition to teaching classes. Literary
criticism is the typical “What does x represent in this book?” route English
questions taken to the extreme.
Literary Criticism
Literary criticism can find new
meanings, interpretations, and themes in books and plays. It exposes the
philosophical underbelly of individual words and probes the psyche of authors’
minds. It also bores me to death. “Therefore, Ben Jonson not only uses Mammon’s dream to
compel readers to associate with him and realize that they too might succumb as
easily as Mammon to con men’s exploitation of this fantastic fantasy, but also
that readers may acquire the same self-awareness Mammon gains by the end of the
play,” was the literary criticism thesis that wowed my professor. I have never
written something anything less genuine in my life. As such, I am chalking
‘English professor’ and ‘Literary criticism’ up there with math, physics, most
sciences, and so forth as something I can do, but by no means want to do.
Before taking another class with the same professor, this time on Epic, I had
forgotten why I do not want to be an English professor. The moment I sat down
to write my first response paper, which had to answer the question, “In Homer’s
the Odyssey, how does Calypso and her
cave represent the ultimate blocking agent between men and women?” I remembered
exactly why I don’t want to be an English professor. I like reading books and
writing them, not scrutinizing the philosophical implications of Homer writing that
Calypso’s cave smelled of “parsley” (5.76), “blossoming violets” was
covered in ivy (4). I’m still not sure what they are, though I did earn an A- on
the paper.
Thanks but No Thanks
Of course, I’m always interested in
discussing books, but my favorite part is the reading and writing of them.
While after this semester I’ll have survived two semesters of literary
criticism, I can happily go through the rest of my life never writing anymore.
Thank you to those who do write literary criticism, I appreciate you, but I’ll
stick with becoming a high school English teacher and eventually an author.
* “/s” for those who don’t
know this indicates that my two previous sentences, “Psh free thought. Who
needs it right?” were sarcastic.
Sources:
(3) This is from a document
dated 29 June 1587, from the National Archives – Acts of Privy Council.
(4) Homer. The Odyssey. The Norton Anthology Western Literature, 9th ed., vol. 1, W. W. Norton & Company, pp. 291–581.
(4) Homer. The Odyssey. The Norton Anthology Western Literature, 9th ed., vol. 1, W. W. Norton & Company, pp. 291–581.
*chuckled almost all the way through* Fun post. Good choice not to become an English professor. I elected to take my love of reading books and fascination with English in other directions, too. "Literary criticism" of the type you refer to was just beginning to overwhelm classic study of literature (back in those long ago days of my undergrad years), and I always saw it then, as I do now, as illegitimate eisegesis. *shrugs* Handwriting→Wall. Not interested in that.
ReplyDeleteKeep that love of reading books. I'd bet that will transfer to at least some of the students you eventually interact with.