Epic Poetry: Tips for Readers and Teachers


Divine Comedy

The latest book I read in the classic list I’ve been going through (Link: why I read classics), was Dante’s Divine Comedy. Until I read parts of it in the Epic Literature course I took this past spring (Link spring cleaning?), I wasn’t aware that The Inferno, Pugatorio, and Paradiso were 3 sections of the same book. I had incorrectly assumed that they were all three different books written by Dante. However, they are all part of the same incredibly long book. While I read selections from it in the Epic Literature course, I only just finished reading the Divine Comedy cover to cover.
            As with many epicists, Dante relied heavily on the classical epicists that came before him, such as Homer and his Iliad and Odyssey and Virgil with his Aeneid. In fact, the other main character, besides Dante the character of course, is Virgil for the entire Inferno and at least half of the Purgatorio.  Dante also incorporated a technique often used by satirists, where they take real people and put them into their stories in order to comment on the happenings of the time period. It can make the books really funny if you get the jokes. Otherwise if you’re high school me and reading Gulliver’s Travels by Jonathan Swift and you aren’t familiar with 18th century current events, then the humor will fly right over your head.

18th Cent. Current Events

For example, as Dante passes the gates of hell where the people who care neither for good nor evil go, he sees someone who is supposedly Pope Celestine V.  Originally, He had run from the job forcing cardinals and the king of Naples to hunt him down in order to crown him pope (1). Once he was pope, given his inexperience, he wasn’t effectual and quickly granted himself the right to resign and did so a little more than 5 months after becoming pope (1). But none of this is explained in the book itself, since Dante’s readers would have known this background information and chuckled at the reference. Without properly preparation, students or general readers can be left out of the loop on some great moments in books. Even if you don’t find Dante’s 13th century humor hilarious, it definitely can help when someone explains that he attempting to be funny or at least make a point.

The Iliad

As I mentioned, The Iliad (Link will it join my home library) by Homer was one of the predecessors that Dante’s paradise lost relies on for genre conventions. I first read The Iliad in my Film and Literature course and then selections of it in the same Epic Literature course that I read Dante. However, at the time it was a bit difficult to tell whether The Iliad was written in prose or poetry. Part of this naturally comes from the fact that any Iliad I’m reading is a translation, as I unfortunately do not speak nor do I read Greek. Some of my classmates read it in the original Greek in some of their classes.
However, I do not have that ability so I must make do with translations. I’ve read the Fagles translation as well as portions of the translation in the Norton Anthology of Western Literature. Fagles’ translation is largely regarded as the perfect translation. Recently, while doing some research for this post, I found The New York Times’ original article on Fagles’ translation (2). Apparently, before Fagles, Alexander Pope was considered the perfect translation. One of the interesting facts about translating Homer is that the translators can pick different meters. As it says in the Times article, “Richmond Lattimore in 1951 chose a long, free six-beat line; Robert Fitzgerald in 1974 went for a tighter iambic blank verse.” But what was the actual meter of Homer’s poem? Apparently it was Dactylic Hexameter (3). For those who don’t know, it means six groups (hexa-meter) of one long and then two short syllables, a total of 18 syllables.
But what does this mean for readers? Well just as if reading a graphic novel, you would want to observe how a graphic novel is different from a typical novel, when reading epic poetry it is important to note that it’s poetry, and typically spoken poetry told over several days at that. When I took a course on Classical and Ancient Mediteranean studies freshman year, our professor told us that in Homer there are often phrases that get repeated again and again, even when they don’t make sense.

Genre Considerations

For instance one character is called the righteous Aegisthus (OR SOMETHING)  even after he slept with his brother’s wife and then conspired to murder his brother. My professor explained that scholars discovered that each character had a given epithet and so any time you said the character’s name in the poem you would say the epithet. Each epithet was already in the correct meter so all you had to do was remember plot points and the character’s epithets and then as you recited the poem it basically wrote itself. This is something students need to know: today we are always looking for the most authentic original version of something. However, that is impossible with stories like Homer’s, because every time the poem was recited it changed a little bit each occasion.

Paradise Lost

Finally the first epic poem that I read was Paradise Lost by John Milton. Since then, I’ve read parts of it two more times. This I think is a crucial thing to remember when reading and/or teaching epic poems. You don’t need to read all of them. Especially when first reading epic poetry, it can be overwhelming, particularly for high school students, the age group I want to eventually teach. People can still read the full book on their own if they so wish, but even then it is good to break it apart into chunks so that it’s more manageable.

Chunks

Thankfully, writers of epic poetry often separate their poems into chunks for you. Dante’s Divine Comedy has Cantos, and Homer’s Iliad and Milton’s Paradise Lost have books. It is completely possible to assign students parts of the epic poem and leave out certain sections and just give summaries. For those reading it the whole way through on their own reading through a book or canto and then reading a summary from websites like sparknotes or shmoop is a good idea. Then you can make sure you understood what is going on, before continuing on to the next section. Teachers could have students write their own spark notes or shmoop summary as an in-class or homework assignment, depending on what your homework policy is (link HW).

In The End

            While epic poetry can seem daunting to even the most experienced readers, they aren’t considered classics for nothing. The sense of accomplishment of decoding what even a short passage means can boost the confidence of readers and sharpen their critical thinking skills. Additionally, epic poetry can be a nice change of pace and opens the door for genre comparisons: How do authors accomplish x in a novel vs epic poetry? How is imagery used in epic poetry vs a graphic novel? Etc. Finally, there’s a reason these books keep showing up whether in high school, or college classes or classics lists. They’re beautifully written. What has been your experience reading and/or teaching epic poetry? What were some unexpected challenges or breakthroughs that you experienced? Let me know in the comments!


Notes:
Sources:
Image Credit:

Comments

Popular Posts