The Tipping Point– Malcolm Gladwell



The Skinny Canadian

Malcolm Gladwell describes himself in his twitter bio as a, “Skinny Canadian,” but he is better known as the author of books like Outliers and more recently David and Goliath (2). Since 1996, Gladwell has been writing for The New Yorker (2).  However, the first book of his to land on the NYT’s best seller list was Tipping Point, the book I just finished. “What makes fads contagious?” asks Malcolm Gladwell and answers himself with stickiness, context, and the law of the few.

The Arc of Fads

Hush puppies, inner city crime, syphilis, Divine Secrets of the Ya-Ya Sisterhood, and Paul Revere are all case studies that Gladwell dives into to come up with his three factors for the tipping point. His theory is that fads are not completely linear functions; instead they are more parabolic in nature. They might start out slow and gradual, but eventually they reach their “Tipping Point” and shoot off and up in popularity. In fact the novel The Tipping Point, had its own tipping point, when then President Clinton brought the phrase into our everyday speech, by using the phrase in a White House press conference.

The Book’s Own Success

            Gladwell has always been interested in mundane novelties. He brings out the puzzling enigma in the dull and droll of everyday life.  Despite having literally just written a book on Tipping Points, Malcolm Gladwell was stunned when he experienced his own saying, “I was totally stunned by how well the book did. I never expected it in a million years. In fact, I still can’t explain its success,” (3). To explain its success using his own three rules, the Tipping Point must have been found by influential people (mavens, connectors and salesman) that then spread it to the rest of the populace. However, alone their efforts would have been insufficient to start a Tipping Point pandemic. In order to reach the level of success that it did, the book had to have a “stickiness factor” such as the simplicity of the message.

Too Simple?

            In fact that is a regular criticism of Malcolm Gladwell. It seems as though he succeeds too easily in explaining complex phenomena in simple ways. People say its minimizing, ignores certain factors of life, and too simplistic. While Malcolm Gladwell tries to break down the driving forces of trends into three rules, he doesn’t (and maybe can’t) tell what of those three rules make something take off. For example, despite the fact that Gladwell spends a significant amount of time on the crime in New York City in the Eighties, he throws out ideas for what could have stopped it, but doesn’t nail it down

Really Guesses

            While people could argue the Tipping Point’s tipping point was mavens, salesmen, and connectors, spreading the sticky message within the context of President Clinton using the phrase in a White House press conference, that’s not a set formula. How can you prove that this was the case? How can anyone test the reliability of Gladwell’s rules? Even if someone would take case studies and apply the three rules to the situations, isn’t the same as a bunch of guesses? In essence, Malcolm Gladwell’s three rules (stickiness, context, and the law of the few) are the typical guesses that people make when attempting to describe what drives a fad.

Why Read It?

            When reading this book, you want to learn what caused the fads, but often Gladwell only gives several options without definitively nailing down the answer. Of course part of the problem may be that there is no definitive answer. But if you were hoping for one you will be disappointed. On the other hand, if you are wondering about the ins and outs of the remarkable things that happen right under our noses, then Gladwell is an excellent author to read. Also, if you are specifically interested in speculative theories about human behavior, then this book will grip you.
Notes:
Sources:
Image Credit: The Tipping Point by Malcolm Gladwell Cover Art

Comments

Popular Posts